|
Stanley Kubrick's
last film Eyes Wide Shut, was not only pretentious and overrated, it was a
snooze. This flick is the last in a series of stylized personal projects for
which the director became known. Given the mystique Kubrick acquired or
cultivated, this posthumous flop is unlikely to damage the legend. For all the
film's textured detail, its yarn is threadbare and its subtext replete with
clumsy symbolism. The screenplay consists of labored, repetitive and truncated
dialogue where every exchange involves long stares and furrowed brows. "I
am a doctor," is Tom Cruise's stock-in-trade phrase. An obscure campy hotel
desk clerk delivers the only sterling performance. This is cold comfort
considering the viewer is stuck with over two hours of Tom Cruise's half hearted
libidinous quests.
Eyes is really a
conventional morality play during which Cruise prowls the streets of New York in
his seldom removed undertaker's overcoat in search of some relief for his sexual
jealousy. Cruise's jealousy is aroused by a fantasy his wife, played by then
real-life wife Nicole Kidman, relays in a moment of spite, and involves a sexual
desire for a naval officer she glimpsed while on holiday with her family. So
strong was her passion, she tells Tom, that she would have abandoned all for
this man.
The confession
follows a society party the couple attends in which they both flirt unabashedly
with others. Again the sum total of the dialogue here consists in back slapping
guffaw-inducing genuflection to doctorness. We are treated to an annoying peek
at Kubrick's and the Zeitgeist's view on the professional pecking order, a view
which is reinforced when Cruise makes one of his house calls to a patient whose
father has just died. The woman, body writhing like that of a snake in coitus
(is this method acting?), throws herself at Cruise. Sex and death co-mingle in
one of the many larded symbolic moments in the film. The woman's fiancé, the
geek math professor, is depicted as a lesser mortal than the handsome doctor.
In defense of the
math professor let me say that he has three degrees done at a well nigh impossible
level of abstraction. The general practitioner has, for the most, one degree
requiring few leaps of abstraction. I know I am missing the point. This is not
about the professional food chain. But neither is it about what Len Blum of the National
Post described in effervescent, stream of consciousness, indulgent prose:
"Attraction. Flirtation. Seduction. Exploitation. Intimacy. Fantasy. Hurt.
Revenge". Because if it is erotica you seek, then the movie is as sexy as
cold mutton.
Back at the party,
Tom is besieged by two models that want him. These females also can't stop
writhing like randy rattlesnakes, their attempts at sexy more phero-moronic than
pheromone inspired. Nicole in the meantime is doing her own hormonal hop with a
Dracula look alike. Yes, the film is full of frozen, flat characters. As they
coil around one another, intoxicated, Dracula applies his amorous solvent:
"The charm of marriage," he says, "is that it makes a life of
deception absolutely necessary". At this point Kubrick is defanged: He
becomes a plagiarist who underestimates his audience, as Dracula fails to credit
Oscar Wilde for the witty epigram.
No bash would be
complete without the doctor coming to the rescue. Upstairs, draped over a chair
ever so decoratively, languishes a victim of a drug overdose. She is nude and
post coital. Tom runs ears, eyes and pulse checks and then proceeds to sit by
the girl's side, sans coffee or an intravenous something, until she is declared
saved. The girl pulls through never to forget the good doctor and destined to
return the favor in the next hour or two. She, the Madonna-whore, is another
lumpen symbol in this film.
Tom's journey to
sexual and emotional maturation leads him to rekindle an acquaintance with a
not-quite-doctor jazz musician. The medical school dropout tells Tom he is on
the way to a regular gig where, when he peeks through his blindfold, his
peripheral vision is filled with amazing masked naked females. Tom decides to
gate crash the orgy. Why Tom becomes imperiled at the orgy is not quite clear.
Maybe he annoyed a patron by doing his Überdoctor routine. But to the rescue
comes a stranger with familiar protrusions. At this point it must be clear to
all that this woman, the Madonna-whore, is toast.
In passing boredom I
noted that the mask of one of the orgy attendants was a Guernica-like Picasso
creation. No doubt the orgy could have done with some Guernica-like chaos (Guernica
painted by Picasso depicts the bombing of that Spanish town by the Germans). The
orgy, instead, is a fashion shoot, engorged with sexless perfect bodies locked
in aesthetically pleasing unerotic positions. Kubrick's morality play reaches an
epiphany when, after a unconsummated visit to a friendly prostitute, Tom learns
she has been diagnosed HIV positive. From across the girl's seedy abode, a hood
in a trenchcoat stares Tom down. This is a messenger from the orgy society, and
the message? The penumbra of sex can kill.
I confess, the only
other film by Kubrick I have seen was A Clockwork Orange, which I liked.
In that cult movie the delinquent Alex, inspired by evil and infused with a love
for great classical music, does very bad things. The modest moral I took away
from Clockwork was that someone who loves Beethoven's Ninth so dearly could not
be all bad. Certainly listening to Ode to Joy was a lot more pleasurable than
to Three Blind Mice, the minimalist score from Eyes Shut Wide.
©1999 By Ilana
Mercer
The North Shore News
August 9
|