|
“Obsession” is a
new documentary about “Radical Islam’s War against the West.” The
unfortunate title, however, conjures a Calvin Klein fragrance, not a
serious examination of the foundations of Jihad. To the faithful, Jihad
is not an obsession; it’s a religious obligation. It’s not a “compulsive
preoccupation” with an “unreasonable idea or emotion,” to follow the
dictionary’s definition of “obsession”; it’s the sixth pillar of Islam,
exhorted to in over a hundred verses in the Qur’an; Jihad isn’t like a
scent, picked up and chased in a pheromonal frenzy; it’s what Mohammad
described as the Muslim’s highest duty.
That’s the problem with “Obsession”: Jihadists
cite Mohammad and the Qur’an faithfully; “Obsession” is mum about their
muse.
Indeed, one of the pillars of an Islamized
media is the “Daily Prayer”—the ritual repetition of expedient
disclaimers about Mohammad, whom Muslims regard as the perfect man, and
his manual, which they consider equally celestial.
Viewers of “Obsession” are treated to
terrifying, flesh-creeping scenes common in the Arab media: death
adulating, Qur’an-quoting kids and clerics in madrasas and mosques
across the Muslim world, all calling for the killing of Jews and
gentiles and for the subjugation of the West to Islam. Nevertheless,
these spectacles are then punctuated by pieties about Islam being a
peaceful religion, hijacked by extremists—a hell of a lot of them.
To be fair, “Obsession” does dispel the
fiction that Jihad is an inner struggle, but then even an A-list Islam
apologist like Professor John Esposito has admitted as much: “Jihad
means to fight to spread Islam, not just to defend it, and to wage war
against [Jews and Christians] who refuse Muslim rule,” Esposito has
conceded.
“Radical Islam”: now there’s another
redundancy that ought not to have marred the message of this important
documentary. If one cares to delve into the Quran, the hadith, and the
Sira, or read
the scholars who’ve done so for us,
then it becomes abundantly clear: Islam is radical.
Consider: when King David sinned horribly,
robbing Uriah first of his wife Batsheva, and then of his life, he was
confronted and exposed by a furious prophet, Nathan. King David repented
and
submitted to cruel punishment. There’s a conventional moral code for
you.
Conversely, Muhammad sated his basest urges,
miring himself and his followers in murder, mutilation, robbery, and
rape, only to receive “divine revelations” that sanctified rapine and
licentiousness for Allah’s Ali Babas. That’s the Islamic moral code for
you. It’s certainly unconventional, or radical.
It might even be posited that therein lies the
appeal of Islam. It’s a license to indulge. It teaches that, provided
they’re Muslim, the murderous, not
the meek, shall inherit the earth.
And it tells the Muslim faithful to claim
their inheritance by force: subjugate, enslave, or eliminate their
non-Muslim inferiors.
It was thus no coincidence that during the
holy month of Ramadan, Iraq experienced a 22 percent spike in attacks. A
similar trend was observed in other hot spots around the world. Yom
Kippur sees Jews struggle to quell aggression; Ramadan is a time for
Muhammadans to amplify it. Again, this is perfectly congruous. Iraqi
mujahedeen were heeding,
not
hijacking their prophet, who had
revved up his raids on the caravans of the Quraysh during the Ramadan.
“Obsession” delves into the “historic links”
between Hitler’s Mufti (also Arafat’s idol), the Palestinian Haj Amin
al-Husseini, and radical Islamic ideology. Notwithstanding Husseini’s
humble contribution to the Final Solution,
the Mufti didn’t invent Muslim anti-Semitism,
he merely modernized it. Nor did the hatred Muslims harbor for Jews
begin with the establishment of the state of Israel. This hatred boasts
a pure Islamic pedigree and can be traced to Muhammad.
When the Jews rejected him, Muhammad set out
to exterminate the tribes of the region. The blood-curdling harangues
heard on the documentary are a variation on a Qur’anic theme. Here’s
Muhammad’s vision for the end of days, according to “Muslim,” book 41,
no. 6985 (in Spencer, 2006):
The last hour would not come unless the
Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them
until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a
stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a
Jew behind me; come and kill him.
“Obsession” features the brilliant Daniel
Pipes and the heroics Brigitte Gabriele and Walid Shoebat. However,
conspicuously absent from the impressive lineup is the indefatigable
Robert Spencer, whose detailed exegeses have exploded the myth of a
peaceful Islam.
On the other hand, since the directors of
“Obsession” appear intent on upholding this Scheherazade-worthy charade,
it is perfectly understandable why they would exclude the author of The
Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), and The
Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion.
©2006 By Ilana Mercer
WorldNetDaily.com
November 24
DIGG
THIS |