|
Let us begin with a species correct,
English-language primer:
Illegal alien Jose Carranza (“allegedly”) executed three American
college students (the fourth survived). NFL quarterback Michael Vick did not “execute
eight dogs,” as members of the media fulminated, he put them down,
albeit inhumanely.
The same Peruvian (Carranza) probably also raped his victims, but
not before practicing on a 5-year-old child. Despite what Nancy Grace
alleges, Vick was not rapin’ on his bitches, he was breeding
them.
Anthropomorphism is the practice of attributing human characteristics to
an animal. Dogs have small brains, devoted mainly to smell and other
instinct-driven behaviors. The love and loyalty dog lovers see in their
mutt’s eyes is a projection of the owner’s large, cerebral cortex.
(You’ll learn more about sharks from Steven Spielberg's magnificent
thriller “Jaws,” than from our idiot, radically ideological “experts.”
When sharks feed on folks, it is not a case of “mistaken identity.” The
reason these powerful, flesh-eating animals with pointy teeth don’t tuck
in more frequently is because there are more fish in the sea than
people.)
PETA’s ethos has prevailed: Vick is being treated like an animal and his
dogs like human beings. “People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals” is
to animal rights what the Sierra Club (and Al Gore) is to the
environmental movement. Both these radical-left organizations are bent
upon using state power to further curb property and production. To be
fair, PETA is philosophically more consistent than those who’ve hounded
Vick for dogfighting, yet spare the manufacturers of pate de foie
gras.
As PETA sees it, all animals ought to have rights. Be it for beef or
bloodsport, their “exploitation” should be prohibited. To PETA, man and
beast exist along the same continuum, their faculties and feelings
differing in degree, not in kind. In the words of PETA’s founder: “When
it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a
dog is a boy.” To adapt Voltaire’s quip to Rousseau, whom he hated (me
too): One longs, in hearing PETA’s rants against the human race, to walk
on all fours.
Like PETA, I don’t distinguish between the pig farmer and the
dogfighter. Unlike PETA, I believe all animals are property. Man is the
only top dog. Although people will go to great lengths to distinguish
their preferred form of animal use from Vick’s, the distinction is
nebulous. One either owns a resource or one doesn’t. Whether one kills
animals for food or for fun, the naturally licit basis for
large-scale pig farming or game hunting is the same: ownership of the
resource.
Arguably, commercial pig farming is crueler than
dispatching dogs, then-and-there, as Vick did. These “Babe”
look-alikes wallow for ages in their own waste, in pig
pens so cramped, the creature cannot even collapse when exhausted. The
animal’s skin often ulcerates and its muscles and bones atrophy. Food
farming can involve practices such as tail docking, tooth-clipping,
“castration, branding, debeaking, and other painful processes.” I solve
this ethical problem by patronizing farmers whose animals roam
and graze, not by agitating for government to criminalize commercial
farmers and hurt the multitudes they feed.
Contrary to PETA, there is a reason animals are ineligible for rights.
Rights arise from man’s unique nature. Man and man alone has moral
agency—only man possesses free will, the capacity to tell right from
wrong, and to reflect on his actions and beliefs.
“Given that non-human animals aren’t moral agents—not in the general and
fundamental sense that we take human beings to be—there is no conceptual
basis for ascribing them the kind of rights human beings are said to
possess,” writes ethicist Tibor Machan. “Rights not founded on the moral
agency of the rights holder are not the sorts of rights that … require
protection in a just legal order.”
Animal-rights advocates counter by claiming that not all human beings
have the capacity for moral agency. They don’t mean Michael Moore, but
poor Terri Schiavo, RIP. Remember how far-left (and far-gone) liberals
fought like rabid dogs to slowly starve and dehydrate her? One
philosophical argument they deployed to justify Terri’s torture was that
she had lost what made her uniquely human.
But, as Machan emphasizes, “To complain that moral agency is lacking
while someone is in a coma or asleep is to misunderstand the point of a
definition, a statement about the nature of something.” An elk doesn’t
stop being an elk if without antlers. The criminal Carranza
consciously used his capacities in choosing to kill. And while a
baby doesn’t have moral agency, it will develop it in time. However
damaged or depraved, a human being is still a human being.
Easily the most salient aspect about human beings is that they live in
moral communities. When the lunatic left and a few “Crunchy Cons”
abandoned the weak and the enfeebled Terri Schiavo, others (Sean
Hannity, Thomas Szasz, Alan Dershowitz, WND, and
this column, etc.,) stepped in to fight for her rights. This is not
the case with animals. Members of the canine community have yet to
deliver disquisitions against dog fighting. However, when the day
arrives and Fido fights tooth and nail for more than Kibbles 'n Bits, he
will indeed have earned his rights.
While animals are still regarded as property under the law, if heavily
circumscribed, the trend in tort law cases is, increasingly, toward
treating them as PETA prescribes. Given the public and popular press’s
sentimental slobbering over Vick’s dogs, this lobby’s power is sure to
increase.
Rights give rise to legal claims. Ultimately, the more rights animals
are granted, the greater the legal lien exercised on their behalf
against the liberty and property of people. As it is, deputized agents
of the Humane Society and the SPCA have the power to turn you into a
felon for “the crime of a skinny dog.”
So far, public pressure, not the law, has brought about the termination
of Vick’s lucrative, promising career. Civil society is clearly quite
capable of censuring Vick. The law should have left him be.
©2007 By Ilana Mercer
WorldNetDaily.com
(August 24) See also the
Orange County Register version, & "In
Defense of Michael Vick, Part 1")
|